But beyond the various generations of iTunes, there's always the issue of their being a Mac version and a Windows version - and I have no doubt that the user experience and system integration of those two versions is often not going to be exactly the same.Īnd you haven't said which one you use - but certainly it seems there has also been a lot more dissatisfaction with iTunes coming from Windows users than Mac ones. On this system, it seems to use between 120mb and 160mb of RAM, which it releases upon quit. Sorry I didn't follow that as relating to RAM usage. Yeah, but it can be such a sweet bondage! more compressed (not as good sounding) file for when it transfers music to your phone or iPod)Īnyway - I don't understand your iTunes vs. (Actually recent iTunes versions have a way for most folks to have their cake and eat it to with that problem - you can now store large full quality files on your desktop - to sound great on your big speakers - but can opt for iTunes to create a smaller. If we both used iTunes our storage usage would vary greatly - but it would be me being the memory hog, not iTunes. In other words, they use as much space as the file format the user chooses to feed them with.įor instance, I lean more for sound quality than file size - someone else's priority might be to squeeze as many songs as they can on their phone regardless of quality. So iTunes - like any other media manager - are pretty storage resources neutral. Each with widely varying storage requirements. And as such can handle everything from extremely compressed mp3 files to 24bit/192k stereo and/or surround formats. It is a media database, player and file convertor. First iTunes isn't a recorder at all - unlike your DAW it doesn't create files from scratch.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |